09-28-2020, 01:15 PM | #89 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1040
Rep 1,503
Posts |
Achimedes65, the auto industry is going to take this "threat" seriously and will adjust their auto manufacturing accordingly. If Newsome is full of sh*t he is going to have a lot of explaining to do when the auto industry only has EV to sell.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2020, 03:17 PM | #90 | |
Second Lieutenant
123
Rep 211
Posts |
Quote:
And if you adjust the time table using the standard 'Elon Musk EV Time Adjustment Ratio' the actual time that this will happen is likely sometime around 2075. |
|
|
09-28-2020, 04:51 PM | #91 |
Private First Class
206
Rep 188
Posts |
The problem as I see it is that battery technology and the electrical infrastructure just doesn't exist yet to have governments force this move especially in such a short time. Electric vehicles are not "green" at all so that is not a reason to go electric yet. This is simply a move by politicians to try and appeal to a base with moves that are not based on science.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2020, 08:00 PM | #92 |
Second Lieutenant
184
Rep 253
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 08:52 AM | #93 |
Lieutenant
345
Rep 586
Posts |
I read that hybrids also count. Makes sense to why most manufacturers including BMW is going hybrid.
__________________
2019 M5 - Marina Bay Blue/Silverstone
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 09:38 AM | #94 |
Private First Class
55
Rep 107
Posts |
Not to offend anyone, but are we really talking about something that is 15 years away. Wow! Would like to see who is even using this forum, if it still exists in 15 years. This law could also change several times over the next 15 years.
Live and enjoy today, which is the greatest time to be a HP junky. With the high taxes, violence, homelessness and huge environmental issues California could be a wasteland in 15 years. I think we need to care more about these issues than having to drive an electric car in 15 years if you live in California. Last edited by Narco1; 09-29-2020 at 09:50 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 12:32 PM | #95 | |
Colonel
1755
Rep 2,835
Posts |
Quote:
As for the lack of electricity, renewables have increased a pretty good amount and natural gas has gone down a large part of the same amount. What happened to this source and these plants? If natural gas had stayed level the overall capacity would be far greater than what is needed. Electricity generation is almost flat over the last 20 years and it will likely need to increase in the future, not an insurmountable problem. Solar and wind production continue to increase and I don't see a reason for this to end. CA Electricity https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-repor...ity-and-energy
__________________
2006 Z4M Coupe - ZHP knob, stubby antenna, clutch delay delete
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 02:52 PM | #96 | |
Second Lieutenant
123
Rep 211
Posts |
Quote:
And our largest power company, PG&E, is bankrupt and doesn't have the money to even adequately maintain its current infrastructure, much less make the investments that would be required to support a fully EV California. And there's also that massive budget deficit and looming pension crisis that are going to consume any State funds that come along in the next decade or two. Newsom's order is nothing more than media grandstanding. It means nothing. He could have said, 'In 2035 all people will need to grow their own food' and it would have been just as realistic as this pipe dream. California loves to talk a big game, but if you really look at the reality in just about every area, it falls way short of expectations. Our air quality sucks in every major metropolitan area, income inequality is awful, homelessness is off the charts, our prisons are full and crime is up. It's a good thing Newsom doesn't have anything more important to do with his time... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2020, 06:17 PM | #97 | ||
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9705
Rep 6,445
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2020, 06:21 PM | #98 |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9705
Rep 6,445
Posts |
I seem to recall the CA Gov stating that "for now" ICE would be allowed.
Remember- here in the USA politicians work for us. They do what we say not the other way around.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2020, 04:51 PM | #99 |
Colonel
1309
Rep 2,785
Posts |
Guess this leads to the question...Will there be sub $15k EV's for sale in 14 years? A lot of new car buyers shop inexpensive new cars. If not, current Gov plans to alienate many buyers.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2020, 09:34 PM | #100 |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Die to inflation alone there won't be any sub-$25k cars for sale in the US in 14yrs.
__________________
"Drive more, worry less. "
435i, MPPK, MPE, M-Sport Line |
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2020, 02:03 PM | #101 |
Always +10MPH
1005
Rep 626
Posts |
While this is all good and such, 15 years later is a long time.
In the mean time, all they do is complain about climate change and how people that don't believe it are horrible and somehow responsible? I believe climate change is real, ok then what? What's the plan to ease the affects right now? California has one of the strictest emissions laws in the country yet every year the heat waves and wild fires has gotten worse. And every year they come out and saying the same excuse, it's the non believers fault. No real actions to combat the yearly wild fires (CARB don't allow controlled burns) No real actions to update the grid infrastructure to stop ignitions. All I can say is this is all a show for them, they don't really care about the environment, and yet people keep voting for these yahoos. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2020, 02:19 PM | #102 |
Captain
1434
Rep 914
Posts
Drives: 2023 Audi R8, 2023 Audi S8
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mt Pleasant, SC
|
Unless the environmentalists begin to call for the annihilation of India and China, I won't be convinced that they actually believe in climate change. 😂
|
Appreciate
2
jmack548.50 platinum90393.50 |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|