| 10-27-2010, 09:45 PM | #23 |
|
Banned
648
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
not necessarily... it could be junk glass but again 90% of the photos is the user... only 10% is the equipment used. I've seen some DAMN nice photos taken with a low end point and shoot.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-27-2010, 10:43 PM | #24 |
|
Resident Kerbalnaut
484
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Yeah I'm were but having a longer lens means I can take pics of things more than 15 feet away from me so more photo opportunities than with the wide angle I have now
__________________
 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-27-2010, 11:25 PM | #25 |
|
Banned
648
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
true but honestly I think better photos are taken closer to the subjects... better depth of field.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-27-2010, 11:54 PM | #26 | |
|
Resident Kerbalnaut
484
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-27-2010, 11:56 PM | #27 |
|
Banned
648
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
still better from close up rather than far away though...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-28-2010, 12:15 AM | #28 |
|
Resident Kerbalnaut
484
Rep 10,703
Posts |
I'm saying that with the limited photo taking spots that they give you at autox a long lens is an advantage because I can take pictures of far away cars you know?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 10-28-2010, 12:26 AM | #29 |
|
Banned
648
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
understandable
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
