04-27-2010, 03:50 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
136
Rep 1,759
Posts |
Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 prime lens
It would be for my D40. I've seen them go as low as $120 on ebay which is a steal and I love how how they produce such sharp bokeh images.
I know this lens wont AF on the D40 but that doesn't bother me much since I plan to upgrade to a D90 hopefully in a few months. I already have a Sigma 10-20mm and a Nikkor 55-200mm VR in addition to my kit lens, if that means anything. Thoughts/feedback? |
04-27-2010, 04:33 PM | #2 |
Captain
51
Rep 714
Posts |
It's a standard lens everyone should own. I've got a D80 so it focuses fine, but AF isn't so important on a lens like this IMO. Alot of the time you're shooting it wide open, or close to wide open so you're probably going to want to dial the focus in yourself anyway. BH has it for $120, I would buy from them before ebay...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...kkor_50mm.html
__________________
Black Dakota | Aluminum | Sport | Premium | Cold | iDrive | CA
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2010, 06:02 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
238
Rep 4,319
Posts |
Make sure you don't really want a DX format 50 1.8. I have that lens and really like it, ~$200 from most places when it is in stock. The other lens you are referring to would be too long for my liking on a crop sensor DSLR.
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2010, 06:34 PM | #4 | |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
144
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Quote:
And an FX 50mm becomes a 75mm equivalent on a DX body, and that is "too long" for you? Seriously? I guess you shoot exclusively wide angle, because a telephoto zoom is going to be far longer than a 50mm....
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2010, 10:50 PM | #5 |
Brigadier General
199
Rep 3,435
Posts |
I love mine, got it from Ritz for a little under $120. $120 is borderline high, try looking around at places like Adorama and such.
Its a great low-light lens too, and because of that and its high f-stop, you can get some nice starry effects off of street/building lights for night shoots. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 12:41 AM | #6 |
Colonel
2569
Rep 2,829
Posts |
Snapped an open box one at Best Buy for $99. I have done 3 shoots in a row with it, including today. I don't even bring my other lenses with me. I really love this lens. Images are insanely sharp and DOF is also great.
__________________
Last edited by KANdaddy; 10-13-2013 at 09:45 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 01:17 AM | #7 | |
Brigadier General
238
Rep 4,319
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2010, 10:09 AM | #9 |
Major
123
Rep 1,054
Posts |
I am the newest of newbies - just picked up a D3100 Friday, body only with this lens and a Tameron 18-270, I shot all day on Saturday with the Nikkor - love it. I am thinking about returning the Tameron and grabbing the kit lens as I see myself using this a lot more.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2010, 10:47 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant General
679
Rep 10,584
Posts |
Quote:
my 50mm f1.4 is my favorite lens.....by far. glad I spent the $$ on it. my lovely girlfriend modeling for me and the engine that god built wash, waxed the next wash....beeding was starting to suffer. I wash my car too much
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2010, 07:25 PM | #11 |
Major General
151
Rep 6,603
Posts
Drives: e92 335i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Cal
|
nice pics
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2010, 11:12 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
284
Rep 3,102
Posts
Drives: Happy on H&R coil overs
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Hub
|
i've seen the 50mm f/1.8 cheaper on craigslist around $80
i've got the 50mm f/1.4G for $435 on Amazon and love it too..some of my samples
__________________
2008 E92 335xi ------->Links to my Mods: H&R Street Performance Coil Overs || 19" Alufelgen CS7 || Interior Swap: Black to Coral Red
My Website || My Flickr || My Tumblr || My Twitter|| My Facebook|| My 500px |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2010, 10:14 AM | #13 |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 387
Posts |
I have it and can't say enough good things about. Only issue is no AF. If you spend a little extra for the 50mm f/1.4 you get the AF motor in the lens. All in all though, I love the lens and the manual focus helps you learn your camera more. Bite the bullet and do it.
__________________
~Chad
Eurowerkz - Midwest Director |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2010, 01:15 PM | #14 | |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
144
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Quote:
1.8D - $120 1.4D - $330 (175% more than the 1.8) 1.4G - $435 (260% more than the 1.8 and 32% more than the 1.4D) I opted for the 1.8D because I knew it would be a less used lens for me. Actually mounted it yesterday for a few shots of the kids for Halloween. But I'm glad I didn't spend the extra money for the 1.4D, and really glad I didn't opt for the 1.4G. Those savings will be put into the 24-70. I was trying to make the 17-35, 50 and 70-200 combo work, but I'm finding that I really need a 24-70. I'm just hesitant to buy one right now, as I'm thinking it may get a refresh any minute. It has been out in the latest generation for 3 years now, but I don't think Nikon makes updates that quickly. With the recent introduction of the 16-35 with VR, I'm thinking Nikon may do a 24-70 with VR. Although, it took Nikon 6 years to update the 70-200 (VRI from 2003-2009, the VRII from 2009+). CES 2011 is just around the corner, so maybe I'll wait until after that passes to buy the lens...
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2010, 05:46 PM | #15 |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2010, 03:10 PM | #16 |
New Member
2
Rep 6
Posts |
nice shots
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2010, 09:35 AM | #17 |
Brigadier General
165
Rep 4,013
Posts |
You can tell by Sniz's 50mm 1.4 to kandaddy's 50mm 1.8 that the bokeh defocus circles are VERY different.
The main differences between the 1.4 and 1.8 I think is that the 1.4 has better overall defocusing elements (the round defocus balls is a lot more smooth), goes down th 1.4 (doesn't mean too much but helps) and silent wave motor. With that said, is the extra 300 bucks worth it for the 1.4? you guys make the call. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|