11-23-2010, 01:52 AM | #24 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 161
Posts |
I just got a Samsung 40" 3D LED TV for the room with 2 rechargeable 3D glasses; I'd figure I give this new fad a try.
So what to do first? I was thinking about getting a 3D Blu-ray player with some 3D DVDs, yay or nay? Also is the 3D TV programming such as ESPN 3D worth the extra $10 on my cable bill per month?
__________________
2010 135i
AW/CR |
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2010, 03:44 AM | #25 | |
Banned
118
Rep 4,771
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2010, 03:55 AM | #27 |
Colonel
1271
Rep 2,339
Posts
Drives: 2016 LB M2 / 2020 X5 40i
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver B.C.
|
i'll buy one when the day comes where you don't have to wear glasses and all tv programs catches up with 3-d
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-25-2010, 03:20 PM | #28 | |
New Member
5
Rep 29
Posts |
Quote:
ESPN 3D is not worth the extra $10 because they only have 1 game every 2-3weeks. If you have Comcast it comes free w/ the HD service. I'd but a PS3 because it will plat 3D movies as well as games, Black Ops and GT5 are great. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2010, 02:29 AM | #29 |
Lieutenant General
970
Rep 15,818
Posts |
I saw it's worth it just cause it's 240hz and higher contrast ratio
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2010, 01:14 PM | #30 |
Colonel
146
Rep 2,900
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 01:26 PM | #31 |
Mlife Worldwide
17
Rep 177
Posts |
Just bought the same one last Friday (one with the brushed metal and glass frame). It is pretty awesome. GT5 and Black ops are awesome on it FYI!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 05:51 PM | #32 |
Lieutenant General
970
Rep 15,818
Posts |
how much did you pay?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2010, 05:57 AM | #33 | |
Troll Harder
403
Rep 596
Posts
Drives: 997 GT3, 997 4 GTS, X6M
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Beirut
|
Quote:
the glasses are like 150-200$ a piece.. so not worth it.. once they become those cheap disposable ones at the movies (which aren't uncomfortable) then I'll jump on the wagon I enjoy 3D movies, and I don't think it is a fad, but if they don't up their game and provide one standard pair of glasses that works on all TVs, it will just be a fad. I can see people owning their own pair and using it everywhere they go..
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-08-2010, 03:38 PM | #35 |
Colonel
146
Rep 2,900
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 10:13 AM | #37 |
Colonel
140
Rep 2,517
Posts
Drives: '11 335xi e92 M-Pak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GTA/KW, Canada
|
I have been thinking about it but for now I will wait till its better and cheaper. I just bought a 40" LCD TV last year.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 10:32 AM | #38 |
Major
254
Rep 1,435
Posts |
It's not just preference. It comes down to refresh rate. LED's are gorgeous HD TVs with wonderful blacks and vibrant colors. However, with 3D being added to the mix the refresh rates of the LEDs are not even in the same league as a Plasma. Plasma will overtake LED and LCD tvs if 3D does rise in popularity.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 11:20 AM | #39 |
Private
2
Rep 53
Posts |
Plasma will always have better picture quality than an LCD. LED is just the new hip thing to get. Heck, it's been a few years since Pioneer stopped making TVs and their Kuro is still the best on the market. Plasma is cheaper and better also nowadays image retention is almost nonexistent.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 03:26 PM | #40 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1849
Rep 1,738
Posts |
Plasma is still and always will be king when it comes to picture quality. I have an 8000 series Samsung Plasma. It has an amazing picture and the 3D is cool, but there is not enough content yet.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|