09-24-2014, 12:04 AM | #45 |
Private First Class
22
Rep 194
Posts |
M3 and M5 touring please.
Always liked those unobtanium RS4 and RS6 Avants. Had an S4 Avant in Imola yellow that was really awesome, but desperately needed the RS4 motor. LCI M3 Touring for the US will be so much win.
__________________
01 740iL 06 M3 CB/black ZCP M6
17 Ford Focus RS 21 JLUR Sarge Green/black M6 21 STI WRC Blue 24 D110 P400 White/black |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 12:39 AM | #47 |
Colonel
507
Rep 2,397
Posts |
It is telling that BMW M has not promoted someone internally. In every company best to promote from within (especially with a presumably deep talent pool), unless there is a strategic direction shift or you are getting the best in the biz. I have a feeling it's the former. Combined with rumors of V10 M5s, there may be recognition that the M division may have veered a little too much off course lately and this may be a return to the roots.
As for VPs of Engineering making decisions, that is true for vehicles, but the CEO has power to hire, fire, promote, demote, and compensate. And that includes everyone below him. The CEO post is about strategic direction and how to best effectuate it. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 12:59 AM | #48 | |
-
11820
Rep 23,186
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 01:38 AM | #49 | |
First Lieutenant
75
Rep 382
Posts |
Quote:
😔
__________________
F80 M3 ZCP - Current...E28 M5 1/30 Blk/Blk US Spec - Current...17' 911 - SOLD...E90 M3 - Sold...F82 M4 - SOLD...F02 750Li - SOLD...Austin MINI - SOLD...E82 135is - SOLD...E89 Z4 - SOLD...F10 535i - SOLD...E30 325is - SOLD
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 03:44 AM | #52 | |
Private
10
Rep 68
Posts
Drives: Z4 M Roadster, E39 E36 E34 E30
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
Good observation, judging by the date and content of this video I think you are correct. Prior to being Head of Quattro, he was in charged of electric mobility for Audi as well. Proof here in first 2 minutes of this video - |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 04:49 AM | #53 | |
Secret Agent
103
Rep 497
Posts |
Quote:
Mind the CEOs are executive officers = business managers, not technical / R&D directors. CEO is there to EXECUTE business & product strategy decided by BMW AG Board of Directors, a strategy which had been greenlighted by BMW AG Supervisory Board. So, a CEO coming form a rival company does not mean products of M GmbH will change (=become more Audi-like) because of that. Van Meel is a great CEO, and BMW AG are very proud & happy to steal him from Audi (before anyone else could do it). Van Meel will definitely lead M GmbH as well as Nitschke have. ... Regarding R8 ... Van Meel was very much in favor of e-tron version of R8, while the Audi's R&D boss & a majority of Director's Board were against it (at that time). There would be a significant differences in car architecture - depending on drivetrain being primarily ICE or (PH)EV - that's why that decision was so important. So, therefore the new R8 is architecturally still an ICE car, and not a(n) (PH)EV - like eg. the BMW i8. A possible e-tron version of R8 will be just a car with ICE architecture - featuring electric drivetrain ... and not being a car with EV-specific architecture. That was the main reason van Meel left Quattro GmbH. Also ... with BMW i program (and especially i8) now alive & kicking some of the know-how & tech can be trickled down to M cars as well. And having van Meel on board (prior to Quattro GmbH CEO he was a head of Audi's electro mobility program), a man with similar & compatible views (he is a true advocate of electro mobility), will make this strategy come to live even more effective. So ... I would say BMW AG plans with M cars are to give M cars some "BMW i magic dust" ... Or, to give some i car a bit more of an M character. And therefore they wanted a CEO who totally supports electro mobility solutions. Last edited by EnI; 09-24-2014 at 05:10 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 05:10 AM | #54 |
Lieutenant
261
Rep 435
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 05:23 AM | #55 |
Lieutenant
261
Rep 435
Posts |
The simple plain fact is that BMW's RWD and probably RWD in general is overwhelmed by the the increasing amounts of power and torque. I can feel this every day with my car, and I hate it. It looks more logical to have AWD traction. Imagine what will happen when electric engines with full torque at 1 RPM or KERS-like systems will be commonplace in sports cars.
Tire development may still sustain this system in the future for a (short) while but why limit traction with only 2 wheels when 4 wheels are available for more traction ? I am sure that there are solutions to the RWD vs AWD dilemma. Look at the Ferrari FF. It has a brilliant AWD system which is 50% lighther and a conventional AWD and can be enabled or disabled as needed, with very little drivetrain loss. I would say that it will be good from BMW to have some AWD expert helping them. It's just ridiculous to have brilliant engines but no way to fully use the power. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 07:12 AM | #56 |
Captain
63
Rep 757
Posts |
I also think they should have promoted someone to take several years working in the division BMW M.
If Van Meel wanted to work for them you should have offered a lower position. No reason why any person selected to lead Team M 10 years working for BMW and give the presidency? On the other hand talking about Audi and the problems that Dr Hackenberg is a guy who has power is harmful and caused the departure of Van Meel. When Michael Ditch remained head of Audi and entered Hackenberg had strong differences with the output and caused Ditch. Over time we hope that BMW has taken the right decision to hire Van Meel as president fits the M division rules and does not intend to change its essence. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 07:54 AM | #57 |
11190
Rep 27,954
Posts |
the doc will be missed. Wish nothing but good luck to the new guy. Im excited to see what he brings to the table. Lets hope its something we all can get excited about
__________________
BEFORE YOU BUY YOUR NEXT BMW, EMAIL OUR GUY KOTE FIRST! Kote M Sales:Kotem@bmwofcamarillo.com Cell:805-368-9101 vipfinance@bmwofcamarillo.com for warranties! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 08:49 AM | #58 |
1121
Rep 2,157
Posts |
from what I've been reading, he was the man behind the development of the R8. Maybe BMW-M will finally have a "flagship" sports car to compete with other higher end brands.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 09:21 AM | #61 | |
Major
643
Rep 1,491
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 09:21 AM | #62 |
Banned
3798
Rep 6,673
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 09:33 AM | #63 |
Second Lieutenant
56
Rep 264
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Coupe-J.Black/C.Red
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philly Burbs - Main Line
|
As a former BMW owner (E46 M3, 2 E92 335s, 135, M6, and X5) .... and now owning a 2014 B8.5 S4, I can all promise you, you're in good hands.
Audi's are spectacular cars. Yes, BMW does great things... but some other things not so well. Same thing applies to Audis... some things great... others not so well. Hopefully the addition of van Meel will make those not so great things about BMW a whole lot better. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 09:58 AM | #64 | |
Big K...
174
Rep 1,717
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Many fun toys... M3CS XB7 FTW!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2014, 10:14 AM | #65 |
First Lieutenant
64
Rep 385
Posts |
The M CEO is the one who will be presenting the M designers and engineers positions to the board and BMW CEO, I would have liked to promote from within as well but he seems well regarded and we are at least getting someone who headed up a successful performance/motorsport division. With rumors of penny pinchers fighting for more FWD and M fighting for RWD, the best thing that can happen is that M gets a CEO who is good at fighting for their position.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|