BMW M5 Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-15-2013, 10:27 PM   #45
son_of_siggy
Lieutenant
17
Rep
432
Posts

Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0bab0i View Post
Its a Base corvette. If it was a Z06/Z07(not sure what they are calling it) maybe.
Not sure what your comments means or how it relates to my post. Can you clarify?
Appreciate 0
      11-15-2013, 10:45 PM   #46
CirrusSR22
Major
347
Rep
1,326
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota

iTrader: (0)

^ I was wondering the exact same thing. I don't get it.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2013, 12:52 AM   #47
wisesoul
Savoir Faire
wisesoul's Avatar
Philippines
83
Rep
1,772
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M5
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Angeles, Ca

iTrader: (0)

Get the black series. Looks special, sounds amazing, and easily capable on the track with the right tires. Sure the auto is years behind the curve, but there are software flashes to fix that. Maintenance is the only question mark
__________________
Current: Alpine White F10 M5|H&R springs|12mm/10mm spacers|Eisenmann Race
Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3|MTM 10mm spacers|Hotchkis rear sway bar|APR Stage 1|Milltek Catless|RNS-E|Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel
Sold:E46 323i
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2013, 10:17 AM   #48
See5
BMW Fan
See5's Avatar
United_States
467
Rep
728
Posts

Drives: Nothing
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Atlanta

iTrader: (0)

Just go drive them.

Having driven the C4, C5, C6, and C7, I'll tell you that the C7 drives nothing like the others. I love the older generations but the new one is absolutely amazing.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2013, 03:19 PM   #49
b0bab0i
Major
24
Rep
1,033
Posts

Drives: 03 TiAG z4 3.0i w/ hardtop
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by son_of_siggy View Post
Not sure what your comments means or how it relates to my post. Can you clarify?
Sorry I wasn't clear. The C7 Stingray is a base corvette and personally I wouldn't take a C7 over the CLK63BS unless it was the Z06/Z07.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2013, 04:02 PM   #50
son_of_siggy
Lieutenant
17
Rep
432
Posts

Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0bab0i View Post
Sorry I wasn't clear. The C7 Stingray is a base corvette and personally I wouldn't take a C7 over the CLK63BS unless it was the Z06/Z07.
Why not? The base C7 already outperforms the CLK black in every category, so what would the Z06/Z07 provide that the C7 doesn't, other than increasing the gap between the Vette and CLK in performance? Only reasons I can see to take the CLK over the Vette is aesthetics (if you favor the Merc looks over the Vette), status, or if you need the back seats for people. Otherwise the Vette will accelerate, handle, brake, etc better than the AMG AND get 11mpg MORE on the highway than it.

It may be worth more in a few years, but that's only because it cost nearly 80k more to get into over a base Stingray.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2013, 05:40 PM   #51
CirrusSR22
Major
347
Rep
1,326
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by son_of_siggy View Post
Why not? The base C7 already outperforms the CLK black in every category, so what would the Z06/Z07 provide that the C7 doesn't, other than increasing the gap between the Vette and CLK in performance? Only reasons I can see to take the CLK over the Vette is aesthetics (if you favor the Merc looks over the Vette), status, or if you need the back seats for people. Otherwise the Vette will accelerate, handle, brake, etc better than the AMG AND get 11mpg MORE on the highway than it.

It may be worth more in a few years, but that's only because it cost nearly 80k more to get into over a base Stingray.
The CLK63BS doesn't have a back seat, so you can scratch that.

I'd take the C7 anyday. The AMG will obviously be more rare, but the C7 is clearly the superior sports car.

Last edited by CirrusSR22; 11-16-2013 at 05:46 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 03:56 AM   #52
b0bab0i
Major
24
Rep
1,033
Posts

Drives: 03 TiAG z4 3.0i w/ hardtop
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by son_of_siggy View Post
Why not? The base C7 already outperforms the CLK black in every category, so what would the Z06/Z07 provide that the C7 doesn't, other than increasing the gap between the Vette and CLK in performance? Only reasons I can see to take the CLK over the Vette is aesthetics (if you favor the Merc looks over the Vette), status, or if you need the back seats for people. Otherwise the Vette will accelerate, handle, brake, etc better than the AMG AND get 11mpg MORE on the highway than it.

It may be worth more in a few years, but that's only because it cost nearly 80k more to get into over a base Stingray.
I would choose clk BS over c7 because of Rarity, resale and aggressive exterior aesthetics. Both cars are already pretty fast and would be fun to drive.

Z06 usually provides all three. More rare than base vettes, better resale and more aggressive with widebody. And performance boosts over the base is a bonus.
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 05:17 AM   #53
rjd598
Banned
United_States
1772
Rep
6,696
Posts

Drives: F30 340i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego,CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Like others have said it really depends on what you want and what you will be using it for. The vette would be my choice if it were a daily driver or I cared about warranty. If I just wanted a cool weekend car the Benz would fit the bill even though the vette is still a good option. Can't really go wrong with either IMO
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 01:13 PM   #54
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
77
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ybbiz34 View Post
I
The C63 sedan is a hefty car, sure, but it delivers 100% of the M3's handling prowess on the street and 90% of it on the track (except with better steering feel in both environments).
Nope. It's simply not a nimble car, definitely not "super car" nimble. All of the things you are mentioning are straight line time slips (an aspect which I said AMGs excel at already) okay, so what? What does straight line speed have to do with driving feel and being nimble? A C63 AMG would blow the doors off a Lotus Exige, or FRS 0-60mph. Driving feel has nothing to do with straight line speed.

I have not driven the C63 BS, but the normal C63 AMG is porky and feels porky because… it is (just like the E90/E92 M3 you mentioned btw). Both cars aren't sloppy on a track, but you know you're driving a heavy car. Unless the BS has done some "engineering magic tricks", I don't imagine that they feel that much different. Completely different feel from a C6 (and a C7 I imagine). Totally different cars in nearly every driving feel aspect.

But don't take my word for it, maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, I've only spent 20 hot laps within a C63 AMG (non-BS) at the former El Toro base in Irvine pushing the car as much as I could within my ability. But maybe every reviewer of the car and platform doesn't know what they are talking about according to you since they describe the car feeling "nose heavy" which is something you would expect from a 4,000lbs car, and is something I felt about the car as well:

http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...257411007DFEED
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...g-coupe-page-2
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/v...8-3965748.html

I've never felt or heard this being applied to the C6 (or C7), Ferrari 430, 458, Gallardo, GT3, etc. True super cars.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i

Last edited by MediaArtist; 11-17-2013 at 01:50 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 03:13 PM   #55
ybbiz34
Brigadier General
ybbiz34's Avatar
699
Rep
4,959
Posts

Drives: 2023 330i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaArtist View Post
Nope. It's simply not a nimble car, definitely not "super car" nimble. All of the things you are mentioning are straight line time slips (an aspect which I said AMGs excel at already) okay, so what? What does straight line speed have to do with driving feel and being nimble? A C63 AMG would blow the doors off a Lotus Exige, or FRS 0-60mph. Driving feel has nothing to do with straight line speed.

I have not driven the C63 BS, but the normal C63 AMG is porky and feels porky because… it is (just like the E90/E92 M3 you mentioned btw). Both cars aren't sloppy on a track, but you know you're driving a heavy car. Unless the BS has done some "engineering magic tricks", I don't imagine that they feel that much different. Completely different feel from a C6 (and a C7 I imagine). Totally different cars in nearly every driving feel aspect.

But don't take my word for it, maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, I've only spent 20 hot laps within a C63 AMG (non-BS) at the former El Toro base in Irvine pushing the car as much as I could within my ability. But maybe every reviewer of the car and platform doesn't know what they are talking about according to you since they describe the car feeling "nose heavy" which is something you would expect from a 4,000lbs car, and is something I felt about the car as well:

http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...257411007DFEED
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...g-coupe-page-2
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/v...8-3965748.html

I've never felt or heard this being applied to the C6 (or C7), Ferrari 430, 458, Gallardo, GT3, etc. True super cars.
In the Car and Driver review, the M3 won by a SINGLE point . . .

There were massive upgrades to the suspension on the C63 in 2012 (this was the birth of the LCI model).

Which car did you lap in? If it was a pre-2012 car, I can see where you are coming from. Otherwise, no.

And the Black Series IS super car nimble.

Read the specs. The tires alone on the Black Series are a massive upgrade.

Black Series: http://www.roadandtrack.com/2012-mer...g-black-series

Nordschleife Lap Records:


2012+ C63 (Standard): 8:01.00


M3: 8:05.00

Source: http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/nordschleife.html

Having lapped BOTH cars, I firmly stand behind my initial statement that a 2012+ C63 delivers 100% of the M3's handling capabilities on the street but only 90% (which is still strong) on the track, where the M3, being the lighter, more surgical instrument, does gain a bit of an advantage on tighter, more technical tracks.

On faster trackers with more sweepers (e.g., the 'ring), the C63 is lethal.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV
Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 11:05 PM   #56
b0bab0i
Major
24
Rep
1,033
Posts

Drives: 03 TiAG z4 3.0i w/ hardtop
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ybbiz34 View Post
In the Car and Driver review, the M3 won by a SINGLE point . . .

There were massive upgrades to the suspension on the C63 in 2012 (this was the birth of the LCI model).

Which car did you lap in? If it was a pre-2012 car, I can see where you are coming from. Otherwise, no.

And the Black Series IS super car nimble.

Read the specs. The tires alone on the Black Series are a massive upgrade.

Black Series: http://www.roadandtrack.com/2012-mer...g-black-series

Nordschleife Lap Records:


2012+ C63 (Standard): 8:01.00


M3: 8:05.00

Source: http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/nordschleife.html

Having lapped BOTH cars, I firmly stand behind my initial statement that a 2012+ C63 delivers 100% of the M3's handling capabilities on the street but only 90% (which is still strong) on the track, where the M3, being the lighter, more surgical instrument, does gain a bit of an advantage on tighter, more technical tracks.

On faster trackers with more sweepers (e.g., the 'ring), the C63 is lethal.
I think MediaArtist is saying both E9x M3 & C63 are heavy cars and you can feel the weight. What he's saying is true.
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 11:25 PM   #57
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
77
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0bab0i View Post
I think MediaArtist is saying both E9x M3 & C63 are heavy cars and you can feel the weight. What he's saying is true.
Thank you. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills sometimes on this forum. The E9x M3 and C63 AMG have been out for 5 years, these are not opinions formed from lack of knowledge and experience.

They do not feel or drive in anyway like any of the modern super cars on the market built within the past 5 years, and they shouldn't, they're not meant to compete with those cars. The C63 AMG and E9x M3 are great cars for what they are, and the price range they fall into, but none of the modern AMGs feel like a GT3, a F458, or even a Z06. They were never marketed to compete with that group of super cars, and they simply don't feel as light or nimble on the track.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2013, 11:37 PM   #58
F32
Banned
20
Rep
688
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SF

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaArtist View Post
Thank you. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills sometimes on this forum.
LOL. It's the reason I refuse to comment here.

Interesting thread, though. I'm big a Corvette and AMG fan as they get. Both are great cars.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 12:05 AM   #59
b0bab0i
Major
24
Rep
1,033
Posts

Drives: 03 TiAG z4 3.0i w/ hardtop
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ybbiz34 View Post
I'm trying to make a point about the C63 Black Series and CLK63 BS.

I'm trying to say that the Black Series variants are serious pieces of kit. You can't compare them to the "standard" AMG vehicles.

That point keeps getting lost over and over again.
For daily driving, you would want a car with luxury amenities and fast engine and that's where the extra weight comes into play. My current vehicle is a C63 sedan also. To me it is the perfect DD, but if I wanted to drive on a track I would choose a lighter car. The weight of the C63 is considerably apparent compared to previous cars I've owned(Z4 & RX7) and those were more enjoyable in spirited driving. I guess it depends on the person though.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 01:51 AM   #60
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
77
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0bab0i View Post
For daily driving, you would want a car with luxury amenities and fast engine and that's where the extra weight comes into play. My current vehicle is a C63 sedan also. To me it is the perfect DD, but if I wanted to drive on a track I would choose a lighter car. The weight of the C63 is considerably apparent compared to previous cars I've owned(Z4 & RX7) and those were more enjoyable in spirited driving. I guess it depends on the person though.
Found some more info to back up what you said here.

The CLK63 BS is listed at a hair under 3,900lbs unloaded on the Mercedes company website (meaning no fuel, cargo, or driver). That's 200lbs heavier than a Chevy Camaro.

I don't care what suspension, tires, etc that CLK63 BS is kitted with, it will never feel super car nimble unless Mercedes has invented a Star Trek inertia dampener that you can buy as an option.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 07:10 AM   #61
IMG
IMG's Avatar
United_States
1190
Rep
7,716
Posts

Drives: E90 M3, E60 M5, F90 M5CS, M4 C
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Location

iTrader: (6)

Benz !
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 02:04 PM   #62
spiike32
Major
spiike32's Avatar
83
Rep
1,127
Posts

Drives: Mineral White F80 M3
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: IL

iTrader: (9)

I'm sure there are a plethora of mods for the c63 AMG, but with the stingray all you need is a cam, long tube headers, some nitrous ... and you have a pretty sweet 9 sec car. 10.6 w/o the nitrous which is also quick.



In 1 years time the stingray will be common and you should be seeing discounts. There is already $2500 off msrp for the non z51 going on at dealers and it's only 2 months into the release. Just give it some time and the z51 will be discounted 2500-5000. My screen name on corvetteforum is Monaco335 if you want to chat corvettes there (I'm picking one up next year).

edit for clk63 v c63
__________________

Current: Tesla Model 3 Performance Retired: F80 M3, FBO 335i, 318ti, C7 Stingray

Last edited by spiike32; 11-18-2013 at 02:17 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 02:08 PM   #63
F32
Banned
20
Rep
688
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SF

iTrader: (0)

Why do people still think CLK63=C63?
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 02:10 PM   #64
ybbiz34
Brigadier General
ybbiz34's Avatar
699
Rep
4,959
Posts

Drives: 2023 330i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaArtist View Post
Found some more info to back up what you said here.

The CLK63 BS is listed at a hair under 3,900lbs unloaded on the Mercedes company website (meaning no fuel, cargo, or driver). That's 200lbs heavier than a Chevy Camaro.

I don't care what suspension, tires, etc that CLK63 BS is kitted with, it will never feel super car nimble unless Mercedes has invented a Star Trek inertia dampener that you can buy as an option.
Yeah I understand your point. I always have.

All I'm saying is that weight isn't the only attribute that determines a car's proficiency around the track.

Just look up some lap times man. You'll see where the Black Series variants stack up against cars like the 911 GT3, etc.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV
Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 02:13 PM   #65
ybbiz34
Brigadier General
ybbiz34's Avatar
699
Rep
4,959
Posts

Drives: 2023 330i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by F32 View Post
Why do people still think CLK63=C63?
I don't know. It's frustrating. It (i.e., the CLK63 BS) does share a few things in common with the C63 BS, being the latter's predecessor.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV
Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan
Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2013, 02:16 PM   #66
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
77
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiike32 View Post
So whoever said it is good for the track needs to drive a cayman S (987 or 991 body style) and I dare you to come back and say the c63 is good at the track.
Heck, not even the S, just a normal stock Cayman, and do a few laps. Then get into a CLK63 BS and do the same.

If you can't feel the difference between a car that weighs 2 tons versus a car that a hair under 3,000lbs, then just get the Black Series.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.




m5:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST