07-03-2015, 06:43 AM | #1 |
Brigadier General
3303
Rep 4,355
Posts |
CTS-V $100K
Not anything major but the CTS-v Build your own is up.
Hmm.. Don't know if I would spend 100K even if it cost less than Z-Germans only 86 lol http://www.cadillac.com/v-series/cts-v-sedan.html Last edited by DocWeatherington; 07-03-2015 at 06:52 AM.. |
07-03-2015, 12:26 PM | #7 |
Colonel
1108
Rep 2,448
Posts |
Not correct. For some reason BMW is auto selecting individual leather interior for 5k and another option. You can still get a base example in the low 90's. That said your point is still valid because to option them equally, the M5 is significantly more expensive.
__________________
2013 E92 M3 LMB (gone but not forgotten)
2015 AY F80 M3 ED 7/9/15 Drop off 7/20/15 Redelivery 8/25/15 My AY M3 ED |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 12:53 PM | #8 |
Major
186
Rep 1,362
Posts |
This new gen costs a minimum of 20% more than the last. What gives??
__________________
2010 E92 335xi FBO 6-speed (Space Grey over Tobago Blue)
2006 E90 330i 6-speed (Arktis Blue over Black) 1984 E23 733i 5-speed (Delphin Grey over Pearl Beige) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 01:59 PM | #10 |
I am Gundam
197
Rep 1,211
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 02:14 PM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
3037
Rep 3,643
Posts |
Quote:
Sometimes it seems hard for Cadillac to do anything right. Lots of people are stuck in stereotypes of how the interior is or other things that just don't hold up anymore, as the have improved their game and they are nothing like cars from the last 40 years. Seems like they are targeting the M5 pretty squarely with this, but the performance might be a few ticks better. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 02:19 PM | #12 |
Colonel
193
Rep 2,341
Posts |
Its 86k. I was able to get to $100,430 by selecting every possible option (including two different types of first aid kits)
By contrast, the m5 is 101k with no options and 115 well optioned. I think a 15% difference is very competitive for Caddy to have the better engine, suspension and weight. Last edited by secretsquirrel; 07-03-2015 at 02:28 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 03:56 PM | #16 |
Convicted Felon
799
Rep 2,198
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 06:01 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
389
Rep 3,932
Posts |
i think its priced right. Its a very nice and fast car.
but i don`t like the way it looks. pretty crazy how they put the competitions specs right on the page. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2015, 06:23 PM | #18 |
Enlisted Member
21
Rep 46
Posts |
I think its an awesome car. I had built one using that the other day and came out around $96k if I remember correctly. While its certainly crazy how expensive they have gotten it definitely puts them up another level to compete against the M5. I was surprised when I saw the start price, but it is a lot of car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2015, 01:50 PM | #20 |
Major
115
Rep 1,158
Posts |
What gets me is how the C7 Z06 is right at the same price as the C6 Z06 was.
They "up'd" the class for the CTS-V because they want to compete with whatever so they decide to make the price the same too which is completely dumb. You'll find these 3rd gen V's in the $50 range with under 10k miles in a couple of years just like the 2nd gen V's are. Oh and no manual? Really? |
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2015, 01:55 PM | #21 | |
Lieutenant
57
Rep 439
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
LMB , M-Sport, JB4 Stg. 2, AR catless res. dp, ETS cp
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2015, 02:28 PM | #22 |
First Lieutenant
106
Rep 300
Posts |
Huh? it starts at 86k and is pretty well equipped... I wouldn't get any options since most are cosmetic... Also as on many Cadillac CTS's, there will be like 8k+ if not 10k discounts a few months from now so it ends up being maybe a 78k car, similar to the price of a S6 but with better performance.
Best would be to wait a couple years and buy a low mileage loaded used one in the 50's... I would definitely not buy these new given their depreciation. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|