08-19-2008, 06:19 PM | #1 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 2324
Rep 5,364
Posts |
![]()
Engine:
4.2 V8. 470bhp, 500Nm 7s S-tronic Weight: 1702kg. It looks like it's going to be more nose heavy than the S5. Design: Test mules are running around with the new front bumper. It has big side intakes like the A3 Clubsport. Should be interesting! On a side note, I seen a silver S5 with RS4 wheels today. It looked MEAN! I can only imagine the presence the RS5 will have on the road. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
08-19-2008, 06:35 PM | #3 | |
Smiling Politely
![]() 1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
it happens bro...that being said...my car will be very dated
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:37 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 1255
Rep 12,446
Posts |
What'd they do to that V8 in order to get another 50 bhp/52 lb-ft out of it?
And 1702 kg comes out to be 3752 lbs. To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass. Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:45 PM | #6 | |
Banned
![]() 902
Rep 46,010
Posts |
Quote:
that's more hp/torque than M3, and weighs as much ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 06:55 PM | #7 | |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 1255
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
And yeah, the C63 is badass.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 07:10 PM | #9 | |||
Smiling Politely
![]() 1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
nothing wrong with wanting a c63 lol
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 07:22 PM | #10 | |
D to the X to the B!
![]() 377
Rep 2,106
Posts |
Quote:
Hmm...if the hp and torque figures are true, I think they are increasing a displacement. I am hoping it's forced induction but many reports point that its unlikely to be applied ![]() And bimmer, RS4 doesn't weigh 3415pounds...it weighs around 3848 pounds (tested by edmunds). So that makes the RS5 lighter by around 100 pounds ![]()
__________________
11 corvette C6
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:02 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 1255
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Haha wow I can't believe I didn't catch that mistake. I just pulled the number off some site when I searched for the curb weight.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:11 PM | #13 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 41
Rep 270
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:45 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 658
Rep 10,404
Posts |
Quote:
1. Displacement is wrong 2. Torque is wrong 3. It will get FI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2008, 08:57 PM | #15 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 2324
Rep 5,364
Posts |
It's number 2. I think.
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:31 AM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 89
Rep 419
Posts |
Quote:
its around 3650 dont know where you got your info from |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:38 AM | #17 | |
D to the X to the B!
![]() 377
Rep 2,106
Posts |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
11 corvette C6
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 10:43 AM | #18 |
Racying Dynamics
120
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Well, I'm cetain of one thing, its going to be a great looking car with great performance.
__________________
==================================================
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:05 AM | #19 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 1239
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Is it known whether the engine is still N/A or FI?
If it's N/A and still 4.2L then to get that amount of power would require a higher rev range. The new DSG is capable of 550Nm and 9000rpm, does this mean the new engine is revving closer to that limit, says 8600rpm. I read somewhere that Valve-lift can increase torque by up to 12%, that would improve the 75ft/lbs per litre of the RS4 engine to 84ft/lbs, that is getting pretty close to the 90ft/lbs being suggested by hkz786. But then look at the S5 engine, it's at 77ft/lbs, add the same 12% improvement and you are at 86ft/lbs. Maybe this figure is starting to look a lot more believable than first thought. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:28 AM | #20 | |
Racying Dynamics
120
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2008, 11:43 AM | #22 | |
Racying Dynamics
120
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
==================================================
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|