10-18-2007, 01:18 PM | #1 |
Captain
60
Rep 661
Posts |
MB' answer to the new M3 - Review of upcoming C63 AMG
|
10-18-2007, 02:55 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
118
Rep 3,431
Posts |
that love the steering wheel
__________________
Current: 09' E90 335d - Titanium Silver/Black Leatherette/Sports Package/6AT Paddle Shift/USB Integration/19" Staggered Breyton GT Gloss Black
Retired: 07' E92 328i (Jet Black) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 02:57 PM | #5 |
Da Kid
123
Rep 4,576
Posts |
its not an answer if it cost twice the amount of an M3
__________________
MODS: OEM Front Splitter | ACS Roof Spoiler | OEM Trunk Spoiler | Matt Black Front Grill | Black Shadowline Window Trim | Painted Front Lower Rod | Blacklines | JDM Yellow Fogs | Custom Silver CF Headlights with LUX 4.0 | Eisenhaus Sports Exhaust |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 03:12 PM | #7 | |
Smiling Politely
1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
oooo cant wait.
i though it was going to cost 55-65k, not true anymore?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 05:43 PM | #8 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 155
Posts |
c63 aka the m3 killa dnt u think that bimmer should step it up a bit more and not let mb beat there m class every year? they should have jumped on that a while ago.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 05:48 PM | #9 |
Law Enforcer
27038
Rep 22,718
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
Beat it how? Straight line performance? Is that the sole attribute that you pay attention to when considering a vehicle?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 06:19 PM | #10 |
Captain
60
Rep 661
Posts |
They're estimating the pricing at GBP 52K in the UK, compared to about GBP 50k for the M3, so the pricing looks pretty competitive. That might change once it comes to the US and Canada, but I don't think the spread is going to be that big.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 06:24 PM | #11 |
Private
5
Rep 53
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 06:32 PM | #12 |
Law Enforcer
27038
Rep 22,718
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 07:16 PM | #13 |
***** noob
1416
Rep 10,477
Posts
Drives: 325xi>M235i>428GCx Mspor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston
|
wow...the sites photographer suck
__________________
2006 325xi (Sold)
2014 M235I (Current) 2015 428xi Gran Coupe (STB) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 07:38 PM | #14 |
Banned
605
Rep 3,546
Posts |
lol
For sure ... check out this rig shot you can still see the rig in the top right hand corner... ________ Amc Straight-6 Engine ________ COOL SILVER SURFER VAPORIZER ________ Vermont medical marijuana dispensary ________ Park Royal 1 Prathumnak Pattaya ________ VICIOUSDELICIOUS live Last edited by Vegas_Sirk; 09-19-2011 at 11:42 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 08:39 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant General
1234
Rep 12,446
Posts |
EVO is still the best mag for sports cars. Well, it's definitely up there.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 08:52 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant General
1234
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Do you guys think that the guys over at //M are purposely under-engineering the M3 to make room for the CSL? I honestly don't think they're trying that hard...they should've included a larger displacement engine, bigger brakes (aren't they merely two-piston calipers up front?) and invested the money wasted in the CF roof into something else.
Don't think I hate the new M3. If anything, I love it. It looks hot as hell, is probably the most fun of big three, and can probably hold its own against the other two (maybe even take the lead?)...but it just seems like they could've done so much more. The engine is such a masterpiece...why didn't they make it bigger? I'm sure it's just all of these initial reviews and whatnot, but it just seems like the new M3 is going too soft on us. That's NOT what the M3 should be about.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 09:57 PM | #19 | |
Law Enforcer
27038
Rep 22,718
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
Quote:
I don't think they are holding back necessarily. What I believe BMW's focus to be is balance first and foremost, all while being as cost efficient as possible given the competition. At least that is my interpretation of interviews, products, etc. The power variable is the easiest part of the equation, but driving dynamics and overall balance isn't as easy to produce as it may seem from an ostensible point of view. That's why we generally prefer the BMW's driving characteristics over most other cars in the respective classes. No other manufacturer can quite get it "right", but they have no problem making power. As for the engine.....well, in the interest of proper spacing between automotive products, it's only logical that the ///M5 and ///M6 received the bigger engine with the most power. I don't believe the ///M to be soft at all, but rather, more refined. These arguments could have gone either way. Development is a two-way street; it's impossible to please everybody. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2007, 10:18 PM | #20 |
Steve Forte Rio
153
Rep 2,392
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2007, 12:09 AM | #21 |
First Lieutenant
19
Rep 375
Posts
Drives: 08 E92 335i Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
|
the C63 AMG is so hot... I would buy that in a second if they made it in 6 M/T.
__________________
2008 335i Coupe Alpine White/Black Dakota
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|