BMW M5 Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      Today, 10:43 AM   #45
brianeck
Lieutenant Colonel
brianeck's Avatar
926
Rep
1,671
Posts

Drives: 2022 M340ix Mineral Grey
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Nyack NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfm56d7b View Post
Echoing the same and raising the bar: if you could lease this car for $199 per month (including tax), would the experience overshadow any perceived shortcomings?
I'd drive an Xm for $199 a month too but it doesn't make it any less of an abomination. I'd probably drive any 120k+ car on the planet for $199, hands down.

The same can be said for a purchase too - if this was 1/6th of its purchase price ~~$30k, would I buy it? Sure! I'd slap a wide load sticker on her and call ahead to make sure I'm below the maximum weight for major bridges quite happily.
__________________

m340ix Mineral Grey/Tacora Red
Appreciate 0
      Today, 12:44 PM   #46
Crazy1323
Lieutenant
306
Rep
455
Posts

Drives: RS6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Memphis

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by IMS-340C View Post
No guys the reason BMW limiting G90's power is not Gearbox torque limit.

You can easily increase HP significantly without increasing torque.
That is not necessarily true. Horsepower is torque multiplied by rpm’s divided by a constant. At the same engine RPM it is mathematically impossible to increase power without increasing torque. If torque stays flat and RPM’s increase then horsepower increases.

Transmissions have both a torque limit and a horsepower limit. For example the transmission in the M5 has a max torque of 1,000 nm (737 Ft lbs). If it made this much torque at 10,000 RPM’s (extreme example) then that would be about 1,400 horsepower. The transmission cannot handle this amount of power.

I don’t know if we are currently at the power limits of the M5’s transmission, but I bet we aren’t far.

As RPM’s, and therefore horsepower, increase so does heat. A transmission can only dissipate so much heat which is why they have power limits on them. The Panamera Turbo S has 771hp using likely the same transmission. I bet that is the power limit (about 575 KW)
Appreciate 0
      Today, 01:10 PM   #47
IMS-340C
Major
IMS-340C's Avatar
501
Rep
1,293
Posts

Drives: Self Tuned 550HP 340
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Cairo

iTrader: (0)

Of course you can't increase HP without increasing Torque or RPM.

What I mean is increasing HP without increasing PEAK Torque and RPM.

If you look at the dyno below of a stock G90 M5 as an example, increasing WTorque @7000 RPM from 500 lbft to 600 lbft (way below the 700 lbft peak Torque and way below any TCU Torque limit) will increase WHP from 666 to 800.

As for heat I don't think it's an issue, we've been tuning M5s to 800 HP easily without any heat issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy1323 View Post
That is not necessarily true. Horsepower is torque multiplied by rpm’s divided by a constant. At the same engine RPM it is mathematically impossible to increase power without increasing torque. If torque stays flat and RPM’s increase then horsepower increases.

Transmissions have both a torque limit and a horsepower limit. For example the transmission in the M5 has a max torque of 1,000 nm (737 Ft lbs). If it made this much torque at 10,000 RPM’s (extreme example) then that would be about 1,400 horsepower. The transmission cannot handle this amount of power.

I don’t know if we are currently at the power limits of the M5’s transmission, but I bet we aren’t far.

As RPM’s, and therefore horsepower, increase so does heat. A transmission can only dissipate so much heat which is why they have power limits on them. The Panamera Turbo S has 771hp using likely the same transmission. I bet that is the power limit (about 575 KW)
Attached Images
 
__________________
2018 340i 8AT RWD - M Sport - Catless MPPSK - Stock Turbo - TU HPFP
Tunes: Self Tuned via MHD - Fuel: E50/92RON/87OCT
https://datazap.me/u/ims/e40tq-iat28...6&zoom=129-194

Last edited by IMS-340C; Today at 01:22 PM..
Appreciate 0
      Today, 02:34 PM   #48
WWM3
Colonel
WWM3's Avatar
United_States
1164
Rep
2,053
Posts

Drives: 2018 GT3, F80 CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA

iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by callmebigpapa View Post
Absolutely beautiful machine and gets undeserved hate for its weight
Personally, I think the hate is justified since it’s the very first M5 generation ever to go backwards from a power to weight ratio valuation.

I like the exterior looks, but lament the downgrade in interior quality. However, this is not exclusive to this car, but a trend with new BMWs.
__________________
Past: 1999 M3 2003 M5 2006 330i 2007 335i 2009 M3 2013 M3 2018 M3

Last edited by WWM3; Today at 02:36 PM..
Appreciate 0
      Today, 03:13 PM   #49
callmebigpapa
New Member
callmebigpapa's Avatar
31
Rep
33
Posts

Drives: F36 420d
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WWM3 View Post
Personally, I think the hate is justified since it’s the very first M5 generation ever to go backwards from a power to weight ratio valuation.

I like the exterior looks, but lament the downgrade in interior quality. However, this is not exclusive to this car, but a trend with new BMWs.
I am inclined to agree with the interior, I don’t like the direction it’s going in. Not just BMW but most brands. The early G series and most of the f series has been the perfect interior to me. Something like the pre lci g05 x5 that’s possibly peak bmw interior to me.
As far as the power to weight of the m5 that’s a valid criticism however I’m able to look past it (I will also never own a g90 m5)
Appreciate 1
WWM31163.50
      Today, 03:22 PM   #50
IMS-340C
Major
IMS-340C's Avatar
501
Rep
1,293
Posts

Drives: Self Tuned 550HP 340
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Cairo

iTrader: (0)

Yeah this is the first time an M5 is not faster than the previous model.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WWM3 View Post
Personally, I think the hate is justified since it’s the Ansaugluft-Temperaturvery first M5 generation ever to go backwards from a power to weight ratio valuation.

I like the exterior looks, but lament the downgrade in interior quality. However, this is not exclusive to this car, but a trend with new BMWs.
Appreciate 0
      Today, 03:23 PM   #51
IMS-340C
Major
IMS-340C's Avatar
501
Rep
1,293
Posts

Drives: Self Tuned 550HP 340
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Cairo

iTrader: (0)

To me M8 competition is peak BMW interior design.

Quote:
Originally Posted by callmebigpapa View Post
I am inclined to agree with the interior, I don’t like the direction it’s going in. Not just BMW but most brands. The early G series and most of the f series has been the perfect interior to me. Something like the pre lci g05 x5 that’s possibly peak bmw interior to me.
As far as the power to weight of the m5 that’s a valid criticism however I’m able to look past it (I will also never own a g90 m5)
Appreciate 1
WWM31163.50
      Today, 03:29 PM   #52
callmebigpapa
New Member
callmebigpapa's Avatar
31
Rep
33
Posts

Drives: F36 420d
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by IMS-340C View Post
To me M8 competition is peak BMW interior design.
I can see it, I’m currently obsessing over SUVs so I am carrying a strong bias. The m8 interior is fantastic
Appreciate 0
      Today, 03:44 PM   #53
ANDREW THOMAS
Registered
20
Rep
23
Posts

Drives: BMW X5
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Awesome in color
Appreciate 0
      Today, 07:43 PM   #54
tsbrown
Major
tsbrown's Avatar
United_States
1663
Rep
1,041
Posts

Drives: 2019 540i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: KY/MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by IMS-340C View Post
No guys the reason BMW limiting G90's power is not Gearbox torque limit.

You can easily increase HP significantly without increasing torque.
Please enlighten us as to the real reason since you’re so confident it’s not the gearbox.
__________________
Bluegrass Bimmers
Current: 2019 G30 540i M Sport | 2022 & 2018 G01 X3 xDrive30i
Past: 2017 F30 340i M Sport/6MT | 2013 E70 X5 3.5 | 2011 E90 ///M3 6MT | 2005 E46 330i ZHP 6MT | 2001 E53 X5 3.0 | 2000 E39 528i Sport/5MT | 1998 E39 528iA | 1997 E38 740i | 1993 E36 318is
Appreciate 0
      Today, 07:49 PM   #55
tsbrown
Major
tsbrown's Avatar
United_States
1663
Rep
1,041
Posts

Drives: 2019 540i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: KY/MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WWM3 View Post
Personally, I think the hate is justified since it’s the very first M5 generation ever to go backwards from a power to weight ratio valuation.

I like the exterior looks, but lament the downgrade in interior quality. However, this is not exclusive to this car, but a trend with new BMWs.
After sitting in/driving the M5 I was really underwhelmed by the interior quality. Mostly the leather on the seats. It felt lower grade than the merino leather in the 550e I drove just before it. The dash is what it is…don’t love it but have been in several G60’s now since 2023 launch so it’s not unfamiliar.
__________________
Bluegrass Bimmers
Current: 2019 G30 540i M Sport | 2022 & 2018 G01 X3 xDrive30i
Past: 2017 F30 340i M Sport/6MT | 2013 E70 X5 3.5 | 2011 E90 ///M3 6MT | 2005 E46 330i ZHP 6MT | 2001 E53 X5 3.0 | 2000 E39 528i Sport/5MT | 1998 E39 528iA | 1997 E38 740i | 1993 E36 318is
Appreciate 1
WWM31163.50
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.




m5:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST