Today, 10:43 AM | #45 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
926
Rep 1,671
Posts |
Quote:
The same can be said for a purchase too - if this was 1/6th of its purchase price ~~$30k, would I buy it? Sure! I'd slap a wide load sticker on her and call ahead to make sure I'm below the maximum weight for major bridges quite happily.
__________________
m340ix Mineral Grey/Tacora Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 12:44 PM | #46 | |
Lieutenant
306
Rep 455
Posts |
Quote:
Transmissions have both a torque limit and a horsepower limit. For example the transmission in the M5 has a max torque of 1,000 nm (737 Ft lbs). If it made this much torque at 10,000 RPM’s (extreme example) then that would be about 1,400 horsepower. The transmission cannot handle this amount of power. I don’t know if we are currently at the power limits of the M5’s transmission, but I bet we aren’t far. As RPM’s, and therefore horsepower, increase so does heat. A transmission can only dissipate so much heat which is why they have power limits on them. The Panamera Turbo S has 771hp using likely the same transmission. I bet that is the power limit (about 575 KW) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 01:10 PM | #47 | |
Major
501
Rep 1,293
Posts |
Of course you can't increase HP without increasing Torque or RPM.
What I mean is increasing HP without increasing PEAK Torque and RPM. If you look at the dyno below of a stock G90 M5 as an example, increasing WTorque @7000 RPM from 500 lbft to 600 lbft (way below the 700 lbft peak Torque and way below any TCU Torque limit) will increase WHP from 666 to 800. As for heat I don't think it's an issue, we've been tuning M5s to 800 HP easily without any heat issues. Quote:
__________________
2018 340i 8AT RWD - M Sport - Catless MPPSK - Stock Turbo - TU HPFP
Tunes: Self Tuned via MHD - Fuel: E50/92RON/87OCT https://datazap.me/u/ims/e40tq-iat28...6&zoom=129-194 Last edited by IMS-340C; Today at 01:22 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 02:34 PM | #48 | |
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,053
Posts |
Quote:
I like the exterior looks, but lament the downgrade in interior quality. However, this is not exclusive to this car, but a trend with new BMWs.
__________________
Past: 1999 M3 2003 M5 2006 330i 2007 335i 2009 M3 2013 M3 2018 M3
Last edited by WWM3; Today at 02:36 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 03:13 PM | #49 | |
New Member
31
Rep 33
Posts |
Quote:
As far as the power to weight of the m5 that’s a valid criticism however I’m able to look past it (I will also never own a g90 m5) |
|
Appreciate
1
WWM31163.50 |
Today, 03:22 PM | #50 | |
Major
501
Rep 1,293
Posts |
Yeah this is the first time an M5 is not faster than the previous model.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 03:23 PM | #51 | |
Major
501
Rep 1,293
Posts |
To me M8 competition is peak BMW interior design.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
WWM31163.50 |
Today, 03:29 PM | #52 |
New Member
31
Rep 33
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 07:43 PM | #54 |
Major
1663
Rep 1,041
Posts |
Please enlighten us as to the real reason since you’re so confident it’s not the gearbox.
__________________
Bluegrass Bimmers
Current: 2019 G30 540i M Sport | 2022 & 2018 G01 X3 xDrive30i Past: 2017 F30 340i M Sport/6MT | 2013 E70 X5 3.5 | 2011 E90 ///M3 6MT | 2005 E46 330i ZHP 6MT | 2001 E53 X5 3.0 | 2000 E39 528i Sport/5MT | 1998 E39 528iA | 1997 E38 740i | 1993 E36 318is |
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 07:49 PM | #55 | |
Major
1663
Rep 1,041
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Bluegrass Bimmers
Current: 2019 G30 540i M Sport | 2022 & 2018 G01 X3 xDrive30i Past: 2017 F30 340i M Sport/6MT | 2013 E70 X5 3.5 | 2011 E90 ///M3 6MT | 2005 E46 330i ZHP 6MT | 2001 E53 X5 3.0 | 2000 E39 528i Sport/5MT | 1998 E39 528iA | 1997 E38 740i | 1993 E36 318is |
|
Appreciate
1
WWM31163.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|